Gacovino Lake

Personal Injury Attorneys

Call Today For A FREE Consultation
(631) 600-0000
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Areas We Serve
  • Practice Areas
    • Dangerous Drugs
    • Defective Medical Devices
    • Offshore Injury Lawyer
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Vehicle Accidents
    • Another’s Property
    • All Other Cases
  • Attorneys
  • News
    • FDA Safety Info – Drugs & Medical Devices
  • Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / News / Intuitive Surgical Robotic Device Settles Case After Botched Procedure

April 2, 2013 By: galadmin

Intuitive Surgical Robotic Device Settles Case After Botched Procedure

A woman who alleged she was injured by Intuitive Surgical Inc.’s surgical robotic device has agreed to settle her lawsuit.

Jennifer Silvestrini underwent a robotic transaxillary total thyroidectomy at Tulane University Hospital and Clinic (TUHC), for which an Intuitive da Vinci Surgical System was used. The device malfunctioned but neither her surgeon nor the hospital staff was able to fix the problem, the lawsuit states. After efforts to reach an Intuitive technician allegedly failed, the surgeon converted the procedure to a “traditional” one, making a long surgical cut in the patient’s neck.

The patient originally filed suit in the District Court for the Parish of Orleans, accusing Intuitive for failing to adequately maintain the device, failing to train TUHC personnel on the use of and/or troubleshooting the device and failing to have a technician readily available who could troubleshoot and restart the device, as contracted for with TUHC.

Intuitive removed the case to federal court in October 2011 and the parties eventually began settlement discussions.

The allegations made in her case, including failure of Intuitive to train hospital personnel on the use and/or troubleshooting of the da Vinci System, are consistent with problems encountered by so many patients who experienced injuries associated with this surgical robot.

There are currently no strict guidelines or requirements associated with a doctor’s operation of the robot on a live patient. This is left up to the individual doctors and/or hospitals’ discretion. Anonymous personnel have stated that their training included only two days of operating on a pig and human cadavers.

In response to a recent lawsuit, Intuitive argued that because “credentialing and privileging” for performing surgery at a hospital is the sole responsibility of the hospital, “the case should be dismissed.”

Lawsuits continue to be filed in connection with injuries sustained by patients at the hands of inadequately trained physicians using the robot.

The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists suggests at least ten (10) supervised surgeries before allowing doctors to use the robot without supervision.

A recent Bloomberg report suggests that Intuitive Surgical Inc., the manufacturer of the da Vinci System, has provided less than adequate training to doctors and hospitals that have deployed this robotic technology. It is alleged that this lack of training may have directly contributed to injuries suffered by many individuals who have undergone procedures using the da Vinci robot.

Dr. Jim Hu, director of Urologic Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles indicates that, “The robot surgery requires a long learning curve to become good at it,” and specifically referring to prostate cancer surgery, Hu says that proficiency can take up to 200 plus operations to achieve. Dr. Hu assisted on 400 robot surgeries prior to performing them on his own. “None of us would go and get surgery if we knew the guy had done it just a couple of times before,” he said.

According to a recent study conducted by the Mayo Clinic, published in the Obstetrics and Gynecology medical journal, surgical proficiency, “occurs after performing approximately 91 procedures.”

During two routine hysterectomies at Wentworth Douglass, a physician accidentally cut the ureters of the patients. Subsequently, the physician performing the surgery and the supervising physician were both required to undergo remedial training. Too bad these doctors weren’t required to undergo proper training prior to performing surgery on patients.

Would you worry that your surgeon has not successfully received training in a procedure he is willing to perform on you? Most of us would never think this is possible. It is unacceptable that any physician would risk a patient’s life performing surgery that they have only done twice before on a pig. Feel free to comment on this blog post.

Share
« Study Shows Diabetes Drugs May Cause Pancreatic Damage
Whalen Furniture to Pay $725,000 Penalty in Defect Reporting Case »

Free Case Review

You Be The Judge

Introducing our new online series You Be the Judge where we take you in to pull back the curtain, investigate the facts, and let you draw your own conclusions.

Talcum Powder Linked to Cancer

Several studies — and the anecdotal evidence from thousands of women across the country — link the use of talcum powder on or near the genitals with ovarian cancer. This correlation is strong enough that juries across ... continue reading...

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Areas We Serve
  • Practice Areas
    • Dangerous Drugs
    • Defective Medical Devices
    • Offshore Injury Lawyer
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Vehicle Accidents
    • Another’s Property
    • All Other Cases
  • Attorneys
  • News
    • FDA Safety Info – Drugs & Medical Devices
  • Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us

Contact Our Firm

Gacovino, Lake & Associates, P.C.
270 W Main St
Sayville, NY 11782

Phone: +1 (800) 550-0000
Phone: +1 (631) 600-0000
Fax: (631) 543-5450


 

 
Attorney Advertising Legal Disclaimer – Admitted in NY, NJ, CT, and Washington, D.C. only. While this firm maintains joint responsibility, your case may be referred to local or trial counsel for primary handling. Not available in all states. Prior results cannot and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which a lawyer or law firm may be retained.
Site Map
Gacovino Lake & Associates, P.C. | All Rights Reserved